State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Akash Bhimraj Agashe and other 1 Advocate - Devendra Ghanshyam Chaudhrari — 24/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 19th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO080003562024
Filing Number
332/2024
Filing Date
20-03-2024
Registration No
24/2024
Registration Date
20-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Decision Date
19th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0907
Police Station
Police Station Officer Tirora
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora
Adv. H G Nagdeve
Respondent(s)
Akash Bhimraj Agashe and other 1 Advocate - Devendra Ghanshyam Chaudhrari
Prakash Bhimaraj Aagashe
Adv. Devendra Ghanshyam Chaudhrari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirora acquitted both accused (Akash Bhimraj Argashe and Prakash Bhimraj Argashe) of charges under IPC sections 324 and 504 (with section 34). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the eyewitness testimonies were inconsistent and lacked corroboration, creating sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirora acquitted both accused (Akash Bhimraj Argashe and Prakash Bhimraj Argashe) of charges under IPC sections 324 and 504 (with section 34). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the eyewitness testimonies were inconsistent and lacked corroboration, creating sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts