Nandabai Vinod Meshram vs Ramesh Bhagwan Wanjari and other 1 Advocate - Rahangdale Madhuri R. — 11/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO080003112024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2024
Filing Number
17/2024
Filing Date
07-03-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
07-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nandabai Vinod Meshram
Adv. YADAO AJAYKUMAR PITAMBER
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Bhagwan Wanjari and other 1 Advocate - Rahangdale Madhuri R.
Kiran Badguji Gate
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Steps |
| 04-04-2026 | Steps |
| 02-04-2026 | Steps |
| 30-03-2026 | Steps |
| 25-03-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court disposed of the defendant's application seeking an inquiry into court fees under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. The court found that the plaintiff undervalued the suit by using a fixed Rs. 1,000 valuation for declaration and injunction reliefs, when the relief of possession requires market value-based valuation under Section 6(v) of the Act. Accordingly, the court directed the plaintiff to re-value the suit property according to market value and pay requisite court fees within 30 days, with failure to comply resulting in rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court disposed of the defendant's application seeking an inquiry into court fees under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. The court found that the plaintiff undervalued the suit by using a fixed Rs. 1,000 valuation for declaration and injunction reliefs, when the relief of possession requires market value-based valuation under Section 6(v) of the Act. Accordingly, the court directed the plaintiff to re-value the suit property according to market value and pay requisite court fees within 30 days, with failure to comply resulting in rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts