Nandabai Vinod Meshram vs Ramesh Bhagwan Wanjari and other 1 Advocate - Rahangdale Madhuri R. — 11/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO080003112024
e-Filing Number
06-03-2024
Filing Number
17/2024
Filing Date
07-Mar-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
07-Mar-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nandabai Vinod Meshram
Adv. YADAO AJAYKUMAR PITAMBER
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramesh Bhagwan Wanjari and other 1 Advocate - Rahangdale Madhuri R.
-
2.Kiran Badguji Gate
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Steps
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
04-Apr-2026
Steps
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
02-Apr-2026
Steps
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
30-Mar-2026
Steps
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
25-Mar-2026
Steps
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court disposed of the defendant's application seeking an inquiry into court fees under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. The court found that the plaintiff undervalued the suit by using a fixed Rs. 1,000 valuation for declaration and injunction reliefs, when the relief of possession requires market value-based valuation under Section 6(v) of the Act. Accordingly, the court directed the plaintiff to re-value the suit property according to market value and pay requisite court fees within 30 days, with failure to comply resulting in rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
23-Jan-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
15-Jan-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
18-Nov-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
28-Oct-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
30-Sep-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
25-Sep-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
22-Jul-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
02-Jul-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
17-Jun-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
-
10-Apr-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
18-Mar-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
25-Feb-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
30-Jan-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
07-Jan-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
04-Dec-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
05-Nov-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
15-Oct-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
25-Sep-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
20-Aug-2024
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
30-Jul-2024
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
09-Jul-2024
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
25-Jun-2024
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
08-May-2024
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
16-Apr-2024
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Junior Division Tirora
-
07-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2024
Summary: The court disposed of the defendant's application seeking an inquiry into court fees under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. The court found that the plaintiff undervalued the suit by using a fixed Rs. 1,000 valuation for declaration and injunction reliefs, when the relief of possession requires market value-based valuation under Section 6(v) of the Act. Accordingly, the court directed the plaintiff to re-value the suit property according to market value and pay requisite court fees within 30 days, with failure to comply resulting in rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts