Nandabai Vinod Meshram vs Ramesh Bhagwan Wanjari and other 1 Advocate - Rahangdale Madhuri R. — 11/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHGO080003112024

Steps

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2024

Filing Number

17/2024

Filing Date

07-03-2024

Registration No

11/2024

Registration Date

07-03-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora

Judge

2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39

Petitioner(s)

Nandabai Vinod Meshram

Adv. YADAO AJAYKUMAR PITAMBER

Respondent(s)

Ramesh Bhagwan Wanjari and other 1 Advocate - Rahangdale Madhuri R.

Kiran Badguji Gate

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora

16-04-2026

Steps

04-04-2026

Steps

02-04-2026

Steps

30-03-2026

Steps

25-03-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court disposed of the defendant's application seeking an inquiry into court fees under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. The court found that the plaintiff undervalued the suit by using a fixed Rs. 1,000 valuation for declaration and injunction reliefs, when the relief of possession requires market value-based valuation under Section 6(v) of the Act. Accordingly, the court directed the plaintiff to re-value the suit property according to market value and pay requisite court fees within 30 days, with failure to comply resulting in rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court disposed of the defendant's application seeking an inquiry into court fees under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959. The court found that the plaintiff undervalued the suit by using a fixed Rs. 1,000 valuation for declaration and injunction reliefs, when the relief of possession requires market value-based valuation under Section 6(v) of the Act. Accordingly, the court directed the plaintiff to re-value the suit property according to market value and pay requisite court fees within 30 days, with failure to comply resulting in rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case