Savita Sitaram Nagpure vs Narayan Maniram Nagpure Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R. — 12/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO080002182022
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
15/2022
Filing Date
09-02-2022
Registration No
12/2022
Registration Date
09-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Savita Sitaram Nagpure
Adv. Shende N.P.
Rajkumar Sitaram Nagpure
Adv. Shende N.P.
Atul Sitaram Nagpure
Adv. Shende N.P.
Karishma Sitaram Nagpure
Adv. Shende N.P.
Shyamkala Jawje Rohit Garade
Adv. Shende N.P.
Respondent(s)
Narayan Maniram Nagpure Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R.
Tularam Maniram Nagpure
Harbal Maniram Nagpure
Godibai Tulasiram Mohare
Bhuribai Doma Sawalakhe
Ratnamala Bisan Nagpure
Vijay Bisan Nagpure
Sanjay Bisan Nagpure
Laxmi Karu Nagpure
Nitin Karu Nagpure
Shubham Karu Nagpure
Vishal Kailash Prajapati
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Savita & Ors v/s. Narayan & Ors (R.C.S No. 12/2022) Outcome: The temporary injunction application is rejected. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience does not favor them, and they will not suffer irreparable loss. The brick factory operating on the joint family property since 2020 with consent of co-owners (except plaintiffs) was deemed not illegal, and plaintiffs' undivided share remains intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Savita & Ors v/s. Narayan & Ors (R.C.S No. 12/2022) Outcome: The temporary injunction application is rejected. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience does not favor them, and they will not suffer irreparable loss. The brick factory operating on the joint family property since 2020 with consent of co-owners (except plaintiffs) was deemed not illegal, and plaintiffs' undivided share remains intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts