State of Maharashtra through PSO Dauniwada vs Ravishankar Hiralal Bijewar and other 14 Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R. — 4/2021
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act Section 11,(1),(D),(E)(F)(H). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO080000832021
Next Hearing
30th May 2026
Filing Number
73/2021
Filing Date
22-01-2021
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
22-01-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Tirora
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
FIR Details
FIR Number
234
Police Station
Dawaniwada
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Dauniwada
Adv. Borikar M.K.
Respondent(s)
Ravishankar Hiralal Bijewar and other 14 Advocate - Bhandarkar P.R.
Ajhar Kamal Beg
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Kisan Rajaram Kaware
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Anil Houslal Uke
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Majhar Kamal Beg
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Mushtaq Raj Khan
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Dilip Jitendra Rangari
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Khemraj Mekchand Tekam
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Ashok Gendlal Bagde
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Soheb Mukim Beg
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Shivram Udelal Hirwani
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Aibaj Nisar Khan
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Toufik Talib Khan
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Jairam Udelal Hirwani
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Sachin Amarshigh Sawant
Adv. Bhandarkar P.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJr. Dn. JMFC. Tirora
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 31-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 04-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 30-08-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application under Section 451 CrPC for release of a seized Vivo V20 mobile phone was allowed. The applicant, Kisan Rajaram Kaware, proved ownership through invoice and Aadhaar card documents. The court directed release of the mobile to the applicant upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 15,000, with conditions that he cannot sell/transfer it without court permission, must maintain its condition, produce it as evidence when directed, and cannot use it to commit offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application under Section 451 CrPC for release of a seized Vivo V20 mobile phone was allowed. The applicant, Kisan Rajaram Kaware, proved ownership through invoice and Aadhaar card documents. The court directed release of the mobile to the applicant upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 15,000, with conditions that he cannot sell/transfer it without court permission, must maintain its condition, produce it as evidence when directed, and cannot use it to commit offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts