State of Maharashtra Through PSO Chichgad vs Shivlal / Dinesh Dhansing Duga — 212/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO070002582026

Filing Number

240/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

212/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Deori

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

Chichgadh

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Chichgad

    Adv. Sangidwar R.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivlal / Dinesh Dhansing Duga

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Deori convicted Shivlal (age 24), a motorcycle driver, under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving in a drunken state on 25/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and considering his first-time offence, poor financial condition as the sole family earner, and his assurance against future offences, the court imposed leniency: simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 400, with two days additional imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 212/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Deori convicted Shivlal (age 24), a motorcycle driver, under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving in a drunken state on 25/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and considering his first-time offence, poor financial condition as the sole family earner, and his assurance against future offences, the court imposed leniency: simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 400, with two days additional imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case