State of Maharashtra Through PSO Chichgad vs Ashish Purshottam Netam — 211/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO070002572026

Filing Number

239/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

211/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Deori

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

82

Police Station

Chichgadh

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Chichgad

    Adv. Sangidwar R.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashish Purshottam Netam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Deori convicted Ashish Purushottam Netam under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a motorcycle in a drunken state on 24/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and considering it was his first offense, his poor financial condition as the sole family earner, and his assurance against future violations, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 400/-, with two days additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Deori convicted Ashish Purushottam Netam under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a motorcycle in a drunken state on 24/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and considering it was his first offense, his poor financial condition as the sole family earner, and his assurance against future violations, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 400/-, with two days additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case