Sulkabai W/o Shriram Puram vs Manikrao S/o Karuji Dokarmare Advocate - Bawariya S.K. — 8/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 6. Status: Stayed by Honble High Court. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO070001982020
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
15/2020
Filing Date
29-06-2020
Registration No
8/2020
Registration Date
29-06-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Deori
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sulkabai W/o Shriram Puram
Adv. Sangidwar P.N.
Respondent(s)
Manikrao S/o Karuji Dokarmare Advocate - Bawariya S.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
Stayed by Honble High Court
Stayed by Honble High Court
Stayed by Honble High Court
Stayed by Honble High Court
Stayed by Honble High Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Stayed by Honble High Court |
| 11-03-2026 | Stayed by Honble High Court |
| 21-01-2026 | Stayed by Honble High Court |
| 15-12-2025 | Stayed by Honble High Court |
| 05-11-2025 | Stayed by Honble High Court |
Interim Orders
Summary The defendant's application for amendment to his written statement under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code has been rejected. The court found that the defendant failed to demonstrate due diligence in filing the amendment application after trial had already commenced, with plaintiff evidence already recorded. The proposed amendment to introduce an adverse possession plea would have changed the nature of the defense and prejudiced the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The defendant's application for amendment to his written statement under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code has been rejected. The court found that the defendant failed to demonstrate due diligence in filing the amendment application after trial had already commenced, with plaintiff evidence already recorded. The proposed amendment to introduce an adverse possession plea would have changed the nature of the defense and prejudiced the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts