Ramchandra S/o Baburao Bahekar vs Rupraj S/o Shyamrao Bahekar Advocate - Kosarkar D.N. — 7/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO070001722024
e-Filing Number
28-02-2024
Filing Number
14/2024
Filing Date
28-Feb-2024
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
28-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Deori
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramchandra S/o Baburao Bahekar
Adv. Prashant Namdeorao Sangidwar
-
2.Gitabai W/o Ramchandra Bahekar
Adv. Prashant Namdeorao Sangidwar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rupraj S/o Shyamrao Bahekar Advocate - Kosarkar D.N.
-
2.Pushpabai W/o Rupraj Bahekar
Adv. Kosarkar D.N.
-
3.Gitabai Wd/o Namdeo Bahekar
Adv. Kosarkar D.N.
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
List of Witness
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
SUMMARY: Both temporary injunction applications were rejected. The court found that neither plaintiffs nor defendants proved the three required parameters (prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss) for granting temporary injunction. The plaintiffs failed to establish they were partners in the weighing bridge business, with documentary evidence showing it was solely registered under defendant no. 2's name, while defendants' vague allegations of threats lacked specific details and timely police complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
List of Witness
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
23-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
01-Dec-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
13-Oct-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
04-Oct-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
10-Sep-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
08-Sep-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
18-Aug-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
05-Aug-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
09-Jul-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
25-Jun-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
16-Apr-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
05-Mar-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
25-Feb-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
18-Jan-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
21-Dec-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
25-Nov-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
04-Nov-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
04-Oct-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
10-Sep-2024
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
06-Aug-2024
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
30-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
08-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
07-May-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
20-Apr-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
30-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
28-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2024
SUMMARY: Both temporary injunction applications were rejected. The court found that neither plaintiffs nor defendants proved the three required parameters (prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss) for granting temporary injunction. The plaintiffs failed to establish they were partners in the weighing bridge business, with documentary evidence showing it was solely registered under defendant no. 2's name, while defendants' vague allegations of threats lacked specific details and timely police complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts