State of Maharashtra Through PSO Deori vs Pandurang Pusaram Jambhulkar Advocate - Barse V.S. — 28/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),77(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO070000472025
Filing Number
39/2025
Filing Date
17-Jan-2025
Registration No
28/2025
Registration Date
17-Jan-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Deori
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
223
Police Station
Deori
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Deori
Adv. Sangidwar R.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pandurang Pusaram Jambhulkar Advocate - Barse V.S.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 28/2025 The court acquitted defendant Pandurang Pusaram Jambhulkar of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 278(1) and Mumbai Prohibition Act Sections 65(E) and 77-A for allegedly possessing and selling 28 bottles of country liquor for sale. The prosecution failed to establish all essential elements of the offense, particularly the crucial chemical analysis report confirming the seized substance was actually liquor, and the panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's case, creating reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
05-Feb-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
14-Nov-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
18-Jun-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
25-Mar-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori
-
17-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 28/2025
Summary of Case 28/2025 The court acquitted defendant Pandurang Pusaram Jambhulkar of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 278(1) and Mumbai Prohibition Act Sections 65(E) and 77-A for allegedly possessing and selling 28 bottles of country liquor for sale. The prosecution failed to establish all essential elements of the offense, particularly the crucial chemical analysis report confirming the seized substance was actually liquor, and the panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's case, creating reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts