Ashish Dhanraj Kathane Through Sachin Suresh Vanjari vs State of Maharshtra Through Police station Deori — 3/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGO070000162026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

14/2026

Filing Date

12-01-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Deori

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Ashish Dhanraj Kathane Through Sachin Suresh Vanjari

Adv. CHETAN PRABHAKAR SHAMBHARKAR

Respondent(s)

State of Maharshtra Through Police station Deori

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Deori

23-04-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

Order

18-04-2026

Order

04-04-2026

Order

30-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed Aashish Kathane's application for interim custody of his seized Tata Xenon pickup vehicle (used in a Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act offense) after finding him to be the registered owner. The vehicle was released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with conditions that he maintain it, not sell or transfer it, and produce it as required until trial conclusion. An intervention application by an animal welfare organization was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Aashish Kathane's application for interim custody of his seized Tata Xenon pickup vehicle (used in a Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act offense) after finding him to be the registered owner. The vehicle was released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with conditions that he maintain it, not sell or transfer it, and produce it as required until trial conclusion. An intervention application by an animal welfare organization was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Deori All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case