Rajani Amol Raut vs Amol Pandhari Raut Advocate - kapgate T.D. — 120/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGO060015002025

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

1382/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

120/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Arjunimor

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

P.S. KESHORI

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajani Amol Raut

    Adv. BHAJIPALE MOHAN NAMDEO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amol Pandhari Raut Advocate - kapgate T.D.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Lok Adalat disposed of the criminal miscellaneous application as withdrawn after both parties admitted the compromise terms and the applicant Rajani stated she is now living with the non-applicant Amol and does not wish to proceed further with the case. The proceedings were closed based on the agreed compromise documented in Exhibit 13. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Reply Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Steps_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat disposed of the criminal miscellaneous application as withdrawn after both parties admitted the compromise terms and the applicant Rajani stated she is now living with the non-applicant Amol and does not wish to proceed further with the case. The proceedings were closed based on the agreed compromise documented in Exhibit 13. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case