Preeti Devhand Sadmake vs Devchand Namdev Sadmake -03 Advocate - Kesalkar R. W. — 24/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 9. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHGO060009652024

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

17-10-2024

Filing Number

885/2024

Filing Date

18-10-2024

Registration No

24/2024

Registration Date

18-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Arjunimor

Judge

2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Arjuni Morgaon

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Preeti Devhand Sadmake

Adv. Ramteke P. S.

Respondent(s)

Devchand Namdev Sadmake -03 Advocate - Kesalkar R. W.

Amrut Namdev Sadmake

Sumitra Namdev Sadkame

Namdev Zingu Sadmake

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC Arjuni Morgaon

13-05-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

22-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Order

11-03-2026

Order

11-02-2026

Order

Interim Orders

22-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The petition for interim maintenance was partially granted. The court ordered the respondent (Defendant No. 1) to pay the petitioner (wife) Rs. 2,500 per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing the petition until the final disposal of the main case. The court found that the petitioner established domestic violence and lacks independent means of support, while the respondent has the financial capacity to provide maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition for interim maintenance was partially granted. The court ordered the respondent (Defendant No. 1) to pay the petitioner (wife) Rs. 2,500 per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing the petition until the final disposal of the main case. The court found that the petitioner established domestic violence and lacks independent means of support, while the respondent has the financial capacity to provide maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Arjunimor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case