Vinayak Kundalik Nandagawli vs Hemraj Kewalram Pustode Advocate - Awachate G.D. — 46/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO060009062017
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
73/2017
Filing Date
13-12-2017
Registration No
46/2017
Registration Date
13-12-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Arjunimor
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. AND J.M.F.C. ARJUNIMOR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinayak Kundalik Nandagawli
Adv. P.S.Ramteke
Respondent(s)
Hemraj Kewalram Pustode Advocate - Awachate G.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. AND J.M.F.C. ARJUNIMOR.
Defence Evidence
Compliance
Compliance
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 11-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 28-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The plaintiff's application to set aside the "no cross" order passed against him on 24.09.2025 has been allowed. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 200/- on the plaintiff to be paid to the defendant, finding that while the plaintiff deserved an opportunity to cross-examine the witness for fair adjudication on merit, his lack of diligence in conducting the case could not be overlooked. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The plaintiff's application to set aside the "no cross" order passed against him on 24.09.2025 has been allowed. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 200/- on the plaintiff to be paid to the defendant, finding that while the plaintiff deserved an opportunity to cross-examine the witness for fair adjudication on merit, his lack of diligence in conducting the case could not be overlooked. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts