Chandrashekhar Jagan Shendre vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Arjuni-Morgaon Advocate - Katekhaye Sarika Ravindra — 24/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGO060003602026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

344/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

24/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Arjunimor

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. AND J.M.F.C. ARJUNIMOR.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

Police Station

P.S. ARJUNIMORGAON.

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Chandrashekhar Jagan Shendre

Adv. Manmit B Kamble

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Arjuni-Morgaon Advocate - Katekhaye Sarika Ravindra

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. AND J.M.F.C. ARJUNIMOR.

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the applicant Chandrashekhar Jagan Shendre's application for interim custody of his seized two-wheeler vehicle (MH-35-AB-3909), seized in crime no. 110/2026 under BNS Section 303(2). The court found the applicant was the rightful owner based on verified registration documents and directed release upon execution of a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the vehicle not be modified, no third-party interest created, and it be produced as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant Chandrashekhar Jagan Shendre's application for interim custody of his seized two-wheeler vehicle (MH-35-AB-3909), seized in crime no. 110/2026 under BNS Section 303(2). The court found the applicant was the rightful owner based on verified registration documents and directed release upon execution of a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the vehicle not be modified, no third-party interest created, and it be produced as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Arjunimor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case