Chandrashekhar Jagan Shendre vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Arjuni-Morgaon Advocate - Katekhaye Sarika Ravindra — 24/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHGO060003602026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
344/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
24/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Arjunimor
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
P.S. ARJUNIMORGAON.
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandrashekhar Jagan Shendre
Adv. Manmit B Kamble
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Arjuni-Morgaon Advocate - Katekhaye Sarika Ravindra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court allowed the applicant Chandrashekhar Jagan Shendre's application for interim custody of his seized two-wheeler vehicle (MH-35-AB-3909), seized in crime no. 110/2026 under BNS Section 303(2). The court found the applicant was the rightful owner based on verified registration documents and directed release upon execution of a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the vehicle not be modified, no third-party interest created, and it be produced as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2026
The court allowed the applicant Chandrashekhar Jagan Shendre's application for interim custody of his seized two-wheeler vehicle (MH-35-AB-3909), seized in crime no. 110/2026 under BNS Section 303(2). The court found the applicant was the rightful owner based on verified registration documents and directed release upon execution of a Rs. 50,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that the vehicle not be modified, no third-party interest created, and it be produced as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts