Meghasham Tukaram Lanje vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Arjuni-Morgaon Advocate - Katekhaye Sarika Ravindra — 21/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHGO060003572026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

341/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

21/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Arjunimor

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

P.S. ARJUNIMORGAON.

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Meghasham Tukaram Lanje

    Adv. KAPGATE TEJASHWI DAMODAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Arjuni-Morgaon Advocate - Katekhaye Sarika Ravindra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized Splendor Plus two-wheeler vehicle (MH-35-AL-3469) to the applicant Meghasham Tukaram Lanje, finding him to be the rightful owner. The release was conditional upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 50,000, verification of insurance papers, and the applicant's undertaking not to alter the vehicle or create third-party interests in it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. And J.M.F.C. Arjunimor.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized Splendor Plus two-wheeler vehicle (MH-35-AL-3469) to the applicant Meghasham Tukaram Lanje, finding him to be the rightful owner. The release was conditional upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 50,000, verification of insurance papers, and the applicant's undertaking not to alter the vehicle or create third-party interests in it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case