Nilkanath /Karu Bhivaji Gurnule vs Gram Panchayat, Dawwa through Sarpanch G.P. Dawwa Advocate - Rahangdale V. D. — 28/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO050004272021
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
59/2021
Filing Date
14-09-2021
Registration No
28/2021
Registration Date
14-09-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Sadakarjuni
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nilkanath /Karu Bhivaji Gurnule
Adv. Walde S. S.
Respondent(s)
Gram Panchayat, Dawwa through Sarpanch G.P. Dawwa Advocate - Rahangdale V. D.
Gram Panchayat Dawwa through Secretary
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Nilkanth @ Karu on November 29, 2021. The plaintiff, who has possessed government-owned agricultural land (0.58 hectares) in Dawwa for 20 years, successfully proved a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss. The court restrained the defendants (Grampanchayat office) from obstructing or interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property until the main suit is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of plaintiff Nilkanth @ Karu on November 29, 2021. The plaintiff, who has possessed government-owned agricultural land (0.58 hectares) in Dawwa for 20 years, successfully proved a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss. The court restrained the defendants (Grampanchayat office) from obstructing or interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property until the main suit is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts