State Of Maharashtra Through M. Tra, PO, Dongergaon vs Madhukar Manwatkar — 208/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 194(b),1 /177. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO050003342025
Filing Number
292/2025
Filing Date
07-May-2025
Registration No
208/2025
Registration Date
07-May-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Sadakarjuni
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
Duggipar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra Through M. Tra, PO, Dongergaon
Adv. Gahane O.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Madhukar Manwatkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court discharged accused Madhukar Manwatkar of Motor Vehicle Act section 194 B (1) offense and stopped proceedings under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The magistrate found continuing prosecution futile since the accused's presence could not be secured despite multiple summons, no principal witness was examined, and no prospect of securing the accused's attendance existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
-
02-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
-
03-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
-
07-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
-
10-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
-
07-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 208/2025
The court discharged accused Madhukar Manwatkar of Motor Vehicle Act section 194 B (1) offense and stopped proceedings under section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The magistrate found continuing prosecution futile since the accused's presence could not be secured despite multiple summons, no principal witness was examined, and no prospect of securing the accused's attendance existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts