Sanjay Hari Wasnik vs Rajkumar Nanu Wasnik Advocate - Gupta V.W. — 12/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO050003232018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
27/2018
Filing Date
28-07-2018
Registration No
12/2018
Registration Date
28-07-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Sadakarjuni
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Hari Wasnik
Adv. Pogale M C
Kamlabai @ Kasabai Hari Wasnik
Respondent(s)
Rajkumar Nanu Wasnik Advocate - Gupta V.W.
Devendra Nanhu Wasnik
Ranjit Nanhu Wasnik
Manjula Nanhu Wasnik
Rekha Meshram
Kalpana Meshram
Bumika Pramod Ukey
Munna Mahadeo Ukey
Lalita Meshram
Prabha Borkar
Ramdas Borkar
Kusum Hari Ramteke
Sandhana Meshram
Rajendra Gowadhan Ramteke
Satish Ramteke
Akshay Wasnik Minor
Sumitra Hari Wasnik
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed plaintiff no.1's application to amend the plaint by deleting the name of deceased plaintiff no.2 (Kamlabai Hari Wasnik, who died on 18.09.2021) from the title clause of the partition suit. The court found the amendment to be formal in nature, necessary for fair adjudication, and not prejudicial to defendants, as it does not change the suit's nature or introduce new causes of action. Plaintiff no.1 was directed to file the amended plaint within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed plaintiff no.1's application to amend the plaint by deleting the name of deceased plaintiff no.2 (Kamlabai Hari Wasnik, who died on 18.09.2021) from the title clause of the partition suit. The court found the amendment to be formal in nature, necessary for fair adjudication, and not prejudicial to defendants, as it does not change the suit's nature or introduce new causes of action. Plaintiff no.1 was directed to file the amended plaint within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts