Gajanan S/o. Motiram Lanjewar vs Umesh S/o. Sitaram Lanjewar - 02 Advocate - Parshuramkar A.P. — 24/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 109. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHGO050003042023

Evidence

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

52/2023

Filing Date

06-05-2023

Registration No

24/2023

Registration Date

08-05-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Sadakarjuni

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 109

Petitioner(s)

Gajanan S/o. Motiram Lanjewar

Adv. Lanje R.K.

Respondent(s)

Umesh S/o. Sitaram Lanjewar - 02 Advocate - Parshuramkar A.P.

Sunita W/o. Umesh Lanjewar

Adv. Parshuramkar A.P.

Ashok S/o. Sitaram L anjewar

Adv. Parshuramkar A.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni

06-05-2026

Evidence

15-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

06-09-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS No. 24/2023 - Gajanan Lanjewar v. Umesh Lanjewar+2 The court granted the status quo application filed by the plaintiff. Both parties are directed to maintain the existing status of the disputed property (Gat No. 100 and 101) until the next hearing on 18.09.2024, preventing defendants from continuing alleged illegal construction that would obstruct the plaintiff's access rights. The court also directed both parties to expedite the temporary injunction application and main suit proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 24/2023 - Gajanan Lanjewar v. Umesh Lanjewar+2 The court granted the status quo application filed by the plaintiff. Both parties are directed to maintain the existing status of the disputed property (Gat No. 100 and 101) until the next hearing on 18.09.2024, preventing defendants from continuing alleged illegal construction that would obstruct the plaintiff's access rights. The court also directed both parties to expedite the temporary injunction application and main suit proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Sadakarjuni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case