State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar vs Sanjay Tarachand Sonwane-2 Advocate - Walde S. S. — 25/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO050002592018
Filing Number
240/2018
Filing Date
02-07-2018
Registration No
25/2018
Registration Date
02-07-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Sadakarjuni
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Duggipar
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar
Adv. Gahane O.S.
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Tarachand Sonwane-2 Advocate - Walde S. S.
Pramod Sonwane
Adv. Gahane O.S.
Kamlabai Sonwane
Adv. Gahane O.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Sadak Arjuni
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted defendants Pramod Tarachand Sowane (age 34) and Kamlabai Tarachand Sowane (age 72) of charges under IPC Sections 452, 324, 506, 509 and Section 34. The court found that while the prosecution presented evidence of alleged trespassing, assault, and abusive language on January 26, 2018, the testimony of key prosecution witnesses contained significant inconsistencies, lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, and revealed potential bias against the accused due to prior disputes. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the acquittal of both defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted defendants Pramod Tarachand Sowane (age 34) and Kamlabai Tarachand Sowane (age 72) of charges under IPC Sections 452, 324, 506, 509 and Section 34. The court found that while the prosecution presented evidence of alleged trespassing, assault, and abusive language on January 26, 2018, the testimony of key prosecution witnesses contained significant inconsistencies, lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, and revealed potential bias against the accused due to prior disputes. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in the acquittal of both defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts