Anita Mahesh Pradhan vs Mahesh Anil Pradhan Other-3 Advocate - Yadav M.B. — 46/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHGO040015262024
e-Filing Number
04-12-2024
Filing Number
1275/2024
Filing Date
04-12-2024
Registration No
46/2024
Registration Date
04-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
Police Station
Salekasa
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anita Mahesh Pradhan
Adv. Ther P. P.
Respondent(s)
Mahesh Anil Pradhan Other-3 Advocate - Yadav M.B.
Jayatrabai Anil Pradhan
Adv. Yadav M.B.
Bhaganbai Shankar Pradhan
Adv. Yadav M.B.
Omprakash Chandan Pradhan
Adv. Yadav M.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The judge found that the petitioner (wife) suffered domestic violence from her husband (Respondent 1) and his family members, though not all allegations against all respondents were fully proven. The court ordered Respondent 1 to pay monthly maintenance of ₹1,000 to the petitioner and compensation of ₹1,000 for court costs, while dismissing claims against Respondents 2-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed the petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The judge found that the petitioner (wife) suffered domestic violence from her husband (Respondent 1) and his family members, though not all allegations against all respondents were fully proven. The court ordered Respondent 1 to pay monthly maintenance of ₹1,000 to the petitioner and compensation of ₹1,000 for court costs, while dismissing claims against Respondents 2-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts