State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa vs Anil Surajlal Hattimare — 681/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO040011792025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1065/2025

Filing Date

02-07-2025

Registration No

681/2025

Registration Date

02-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon

Judge

2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

277

Police Station

Salekasa

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa

Adv. Rangari P.K.

Respondent(s)

Anil Surajlal Hattimare

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon

11-03-2026

Disposed

15-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

25-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

02-07-2025

Summons_Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court discharged accused Anil Surajlal Hattimare under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case. The discharge was granted because the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and did not file the Charge Ability (C.A) report despite six months elapsing since the case filing, making it difficult to proceed with trial. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings by showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged accused Anil Surajlal Hattimare under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case. The discharge was granted because the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and did not file the Charge Ability (C.A) report despite six months elapsing since the case filing, making it difficult to proceed with trial. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings by showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case