State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa vs Anil Surajlal Hattimare — 681/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO040011792025

Filing Number

1065/2025

Filing Date

02-Jul-2025

Registration No

681/2025

Registration Date

02-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon

Judge

2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

277

Police Station

Salekasa

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa

    Adv. Rangari P.K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anil Surajlal Hattimare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Summary The court discharged accused Anil Surajlal Hattimare under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case. The discharge was granted because the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and did not file the Charge Ability (C.A) report despite six months elapsing since the case filing, making it difficult to proceed with trial. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings by showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon

  5. 25-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon

  6. 02-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 681/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged accused Anil Surajlal Hattimare under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case. The discharge was granted because the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and did not file the Charge Ability (C.A) report despite six months elapsing since the case filing, making it difficult to proceed with trial. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings by showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case