Shivram S/o Chaitram Wadhai other-5 vs Sushila Wd/o Ravindra Bahekar other-1 Advocate - Munshilal H Uprade — 68/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO040009982024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-07-2024
Filing Number
158/2024
Filing Date
03-08-2024
Registration No
68/2024
Registration Date
03-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivram S/o Chaitram Wadhai other-5
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Jairam S/o Chaitram Wadhai
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Santosh S/o Chaitram Wadhai
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Kamuna W/o Kisan Doye
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Seetabai Wd/o Chaitram Wadhai
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Pramod S/o Limraj Barse
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Respondent(s)
Sushila Wd/o Ravindra Bahekar other-1 Advocate - Munshilal H Uprade
Vinisha D/o Ravindra Bahekar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Steps
Steps
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Steps |
| 11-03-2026 | Steps |
| 18-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 02-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application to set aside the "no written statement" (no WS) order dated 20/09/2025. The court condoned the 6-month delay in filing the written statement, finding it necessary to decide the suit on merits and granting the defendant one opportunity to file it. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the plaintiff as compensation for the inconvenience caused by the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application to set aside the "no written statement" (no WS) order dated 20/09/2025. The court condoned the 6-month delay in filing the written statement, finding it necessary to decide the suit on merits and granting the defendant one opportunity to file it. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the plaintiff as compensation for the inconvenience caused by the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts