State of Maharashtra through Excise Inspector Gondia vs Ashish Dindayal Turkar — 567/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO040009902025

Filing Number

899/2025

Filing Date

04-Jun-2025

Registration No

567/2025

Registration Date

04-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

98

Police Station

Amgaon

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through Excise Inspector Gondia

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashish Dindayal Turkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate stopped the proceedings against Ashish Dindayal Turkar under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and discharged him from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over five years, making continuation improper. Seized liquor was ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal and other items destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon

  5. 24-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon

  6. 04-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 567/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate stopped the proceedings against Ashish Dindayal Turkar under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and discharged him from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over five years, making continuation improper. Seized liquor was ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal and other items destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case