State of Maharashtra through Excise Inspector Gondia vs Ashish Dindayal Turkar — 567/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO040009902025

Case disposed

Filing Number

899/2025

Filing Date

04-06-2025

Registration No

567/2025

Registration Date

04-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

98

Police Station

Amgaon

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through Excise Inspector Gondia

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Ashish Dindayal Turkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

24-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

04-06-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate stopped the proceedings against Ashish Dindayal Turkar under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and discharged him from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over five years, making continuation improper. Seized liquor was ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal and other items destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate stopped the proceedings against Ashish Dindayal Turkar under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and discharged him from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over five years, making continuation improper. Seized liquor was ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal and other items destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case