State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa vs Bhumeshwar Barku Shahare Advocate - Sheikh N.Y. — 489/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO040009642023
Filing Number
841/2023
Filing Date
29-08-2023
Registration No
489/2023
Registration Date
29-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
273
Police Station
Salekasa
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bhumeshwar Barku Shahare Advocate - Sheikh N.Y.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 06-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Amargaon acquitted the accused Kumeshwar Barku Shahare of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Act, Section 12(a), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, and crucial prosecution evidence (official records from investigating and police officers) was not presented, making it impossible to conclusively prove the accused was operating an illegal gambling operation involving lottery numbers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Amargaon acquitted the accused Kumeshwar Barku Shahare of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Act, Section 12(a), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, and crucial prosecution evidence (official records from investigating and police officers) was not presented, making it impossible to conclusively prove the accused was operating an illegal gambling operation involving lottery numbers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts