Suman Gramin Biger Sahkari Path Sanstha Ltd. Salekasa vs Kastoorchand Nama Jog Advocate - Gupta H.R. — 463/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO040009162019
Filing Number
797/2019
Filing Date
13-09-2019
Registration No
463/2019
Registration Date
13-09-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
Police Station
Salekasa
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suman Gramin Biger Sahkari Path Sanstha Ltd. Salekasa
Adv. Lilhare R.D.
Respondent(s)
Kastoorchand Nama Jog Advocate - Gupta H.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Amgaon acquitted Kastorchand Nama Jog of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the complainant lacked proper legal authority to prosecute (the bank's resolution was passed outside formal meeting procedures, making the power of attorney defective). Additionally, the court determined the complainant failed to prove the exact legal debt amount owed, as the accused had a Rs.20,000 fixed deposit that was adjusted against the loan, undermining the claim that Rs.75,734 was due. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Amgaon acquitted Kastorchand Nama Jog of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the complainant lacked proper legal authority to prosecute (the bank's resolution was passed outside formal meeting procedures, making the power of attorney defective). Additionally, the court determined the complainant failed to prove the exact legal debt amount owed, as the accused had a Rs.20,000 fixed deposit that was adjusted against the loan, undermining the claim that Rs.75,734 was due. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts