Latikabai wd/o Tikaram Bhimte other-8 vs Charandas s/o Dhana Bhimte other-3 Advocate - Gupta H.R. — 44/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO040008012025
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
e-Filing Number
05-05-2025
Filing Number
74/2025
Filing Date
06-05-2025
Registration No
44/2025
Registration Date
06-05-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Latikabai wd/o Tikaram Bhimte other-8
Adv. Lilhare R.D.
Yuvraj s/o Tikaram Bhimte
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Sevak s/o Tikaram Bhimte
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Sheelaprabha wd/o Manikdas Bhimte
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Mahendra s/o Manikdas Bhimte
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Surendra s/o Manikdas Bhimte
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Dharmendra s/o Manikdas Bhimte
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Anil s/o Manikdas Bhimte
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Priyanka w/o Anirudha Bansod
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Respondent(s)
Charandas s/o Dhana Bhimte other-3 Advocate - Gupta H.R.
Hira s/o Jiwan Bhimte
Pralhad s/o Jiwan Bhimte
Sobha w/o Sunil Dongre
Rajesh Bharatram Shende
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Manish Dulichand Meshram
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Hearing
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 27-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 24-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 20-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 16-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to add defendants no. 5 and 6 as necessary parties and to amend the plaint under Order I Rule 10 and Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs claimed ownership of the suit property and alleged that defendants illegally sold it via a sale deed dated 04/03/2026 to the proposed new defendants, with the sale being void under the doctrine of lis-pendens. The court found that the proposed defendants' presence was necessary for complete adjudication of the ownership dispute and directed the plaintiffs to amend the plaint and file amended copies within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to add defendants no. 5 and 6 as necessary parties and to amend the plaint under Order I Rule 10 and Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs claimed ownership of the suit property and alleged that defendants illegally sold it via a sale deed dated 04/03/2026 to the proposed new defendants, with the sale being void under the doctrine of lis-pendens. The court found that the proposed defendants' presence was necessary for complete adjudication of the ownership dispute and directed the plaintiffs to amend the plaint and file amended copies within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts