Vishwanath s/o Tikaram Dongre other-3 vs Charandas s/o Dhana Bhimte other-3 Advocate - Gupta H.R. — 45/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHGO040007972025

Hearing

Next Hearing

07th July 2026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2025

Filing Number

73/2025

Filing Date

06-05-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

06-05-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Vishwanath s/o Tikaram Dongre other-3

Adv. Lilhare R.D.

Namdev s/o Tikaram Dongre

Adv. Naved Sheikh

Wasudeo s/o Tikaram Dongre

Adv. Naved Sheikh

Dewanand s/o Tikaram Dongre

Adv. Naved Sheikh

Respondent(s)

Charandas s/o Dhana Bhimte other-3 Advocate - Gupta H.R.

Hira s/o Jiwan Bhimte

Pralhad s/o Jiwan Bhimte

Sobha w/o Sunil Dongre

Rajesh Bharatram Shende

Adv. Tayde P.C.

Manish Dulichand Meshram

Adv. Tayde P.C.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon

02-05-2026

Hearing

27-04-2026

W.S. and Say

24-04-2026

W.S. and Say

20-04-2026

W.S. and Say

16-04-2026

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by the plaintiffs for addition of defendants 5 and 6 and amendment of the plaint was allowed. The court found that the proposed defendants are necessary parties to the suit since they acquired rights over the disputed property through a sale deed executed during the pendency of the case, and the ownership issue is central to the dispute. The plaintiffs have been directed to amend the plaint and add the new defendants within 14 days, and supply amended copies within the same period, with both parties bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by the plaintiffs for addition of defendants 5 and 6 and amendment of the plaint was allowed. The court found that the proposed defendants are necessary parties to the suit since they acquired rights over the disputed property through a sale deed executed during the pendency of the case, and the ownership issue is central to the dispute. The plaintiffs have been directed to amend the plaint and add the new defendants within 14 days, and supply amended copies within the same period, with both parties bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case