Vishwanath s/o Tikaram Dongre other-3 vs Charandas s/o Dhana Bhimte other-3 Advocate - Gupta H.R. — 45/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO040007972025
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2025
Filing Number
73/2025
Filing Date
06-05-2025
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
06-05-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishwanath s/o Tikaram Dongre other-3
Adv. Lilhare R.D.
Namdev s/o Tikaram Dongre
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Wasudeo s/o Tikaram Dongre
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Dewanand s/o Tikaram Dongre
Adv. Naved Sheikh
Respondent(s)
Charandas s/o Dhana Bhimte other-3 Advocate - Gupta H.R.
Hira s/o Jiwan Bhimte
Pralhad s/o Jiwan Bhimte
Sobha w/o Sunil Dongre
Rajesh Bharatram Shende
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Manish Dulichand Meshram
Adv. Tayde P.C.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Hearing
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 27-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 24-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 20-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 16-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by the plaintiffs for addition of defendants 5 and 6 and amendment of the plaint was allowed. The court found that the proposed defendants are necessary parties to the suit since they acquired rights over the disputed property through a sale deed executed during the pendency of the case, and the ownership issue is central to the dispute. The plaintiffs have been directed to amend the plaint and add the new defendants within 14 days, and supply amended copies within the same period, with both parties bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by the plaintiffs for addition of defendants 5 and 6 and amendment of the plaint was allowed. The court found that the proposed defendants are necessary parties to the suit since they acquired rights over the disputed property through a sale deed executed during the pendency of the case, and the ownership issue is central to the dispute. The plaintiffs have been directed to amend the plaint and add the new defendants within 14 days, and supply amended copies within the same period, with both parties bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts