State of Maharashtra Through Excise Inspector Deori vs Manish Prabhunath Barpande — 373/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO040007152025
Filing Number
641/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
373/2025
Registration Date
28-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
146
Police Station
Salekasa
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Excise Inspector Deori
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Manish Prabhunath Barpande
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 18-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 26-06-2025 | Filing of Surety |
| 28-04-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court discharged accused Manish Prabhunath Barpande under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act). The discharge was ordered due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and non-filing of the Charge-sheet report despite six months elapsing, making trial continuation impractical. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court discharged accused Manish Prabhunath Barpande under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act). The discharge was ordered due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and non-filing of the Charge-sheet report despite six months elapsing, making trial continuation impractical. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts