State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa vs Chainlal Maharuji Maraskolhe — 295/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e,66(1)b. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHGO040005782025

Case disposed

Filing Number

514/2025

Filing Date

02-04-2025

Registration No

295/2025

Registration Date

02-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon

Judge

2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

Salekasa

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e,66(1)b

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Chainlal Maharuji Maraskolhe

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon

11-03-2026

Disposed

11-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

11-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

19-06-2025

Awaiting Summons

02-04-2025

Summons_Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court discharged accused Chainlal Maharuji Marashkolhe under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(e) & 66(1)(b)). The discharge was ordered due to the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence, non-filing of the C.A report despite six months elapsing, making trial proceedings untenable. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged accused Chainlal Maharuji Marashkolhe under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(e) & 66(1)(b)). The discharge was ordered due to the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence, non-filing of the C.A report despite six months elapsing, making trial proceedings untenable. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case