State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa vs Amarlal Narad Uikey — 280/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),77(a). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO040005382025
Filing Number
475/2025
Filing Date
28-Mar-2025
Registration No
280/2025
Registration Date
28-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
27
Police Station
Salekasa
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amarlal Narad Uikey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court stopped proceedings and discharged accused Amarlal Narad Uikey under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(e) & 77(a)) due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and non-filing of the C.A report despite six months elapsing. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings by showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon
-
11-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon
-
11-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon
-
19-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.m.f.c., Amgaon
-
28-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 280/2025
The court stopped proceedings and discharged accused Amarlal Narad Uikey under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(e) & 77(a)) due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and non-filing of the C.A report despite six months elapsing. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings by showing justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts