State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa vs Radheshyam Somaji Bhagat Advocate - Sheikh N.Y. — 168/2024
Case under Animal Preservation Act ( Maharashtra ) Section 5(a)(1),5(a)(2),5(b). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHGO040002982024
Filing Number
267/2024
Filing Date
01-03-2024
Registration No
168/2024
Registration Date
01-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
402
Police Station
Salekasa
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Radheshyam Somaji Bhagat Advocate - Sheikh N.Y.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JtCivil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 05-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary Case: Government v. Rajeshyam Somaji Bhagat (FIR 402/2023, Saleksa Police Station, Gondia District) Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate acquitted the accused Rajeshyam Somaji Bhagat of charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (Sections 11(c)(j)(jh) and 5(a)(1), 5(a)(2), 5(b)). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally confined and intended to slaughter 13 cattle, as the evidence presented was insufficient and lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary Case: Government v. Rajeshyam Somaji Bhagat (FIR 402/2023, Saleksa Police Station, Gondia District) Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate acquitted the accused Rajeshyam Somaji Bhagat of charges under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (Sections 11(c)(j)(jh) and 5(a)(1), 5(a)(2), 5(b)). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally confined and intended to slaughter 13 cattle, as the evidence presented was insufficient and lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts