Tukaram So Shankar Bohare vs Vithabai Wdo Vithoba Bohare Advocate - Gupta H.R. — 1200020/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Amended W.S.. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHGO040002542015
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
26/2015
Filing Date
02-05-2015
Registration No
1200020/2015
Registration Date
06-05-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Amgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tukaram So Shankar Bohare
Adv. Uprade Y.H.
Khemchand so Shankar Bohare
Adv. Uprade Y.H.
Suresh So Shankar Bohare
Adv. Uprade Y.H.
Channdrakala Wo Udaram Funde
Adv. Uprade Y.H.
Respondent(s)
Vithabai Wdo Vithoba Bohare Advocate - Gupta H.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge, Junior Division, & J.M.F.C., Amgaon
Amended W.S.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Amended W.S. |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to add a new issue to the case. A new issue (2B) was framed asking "Whether plaintiff is entitled for the relief of mandatory injunction for removal of construction as prayed?" This issue was found necessary to decide the dispute regarding the plaintiffs' entitlement to mandatory injunction under Order XIV Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application to add a new issue to the case. A new issue (2B) was framed asking "Whether plaintiff is entitled for the relief of mandatory injunction for removal of construction as prayed?" This issue was found necessary to decide the dispute regarding the plaintiffs' entitlement to mandatory injunction under Order XIV Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts