State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora vs Chhaya Arjun Meshram 2 (Atro.-ST) Advocate - Harinkhede R.T. — 181/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,34. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHGO010016652023

Charge

Next Hearing

25th May 2026

Filing Number

999/2023

Filing Date

22-12-2023

Registration No

181/2023

Registration Date

22-12-2023

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia

FIR Details

FIR Number

871

Police Station

Tirora

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,34
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora

Adv. Chandwani M. S.

Respondent(s)

Chhaya Arjun Meshram 2 (Atro.-ST) Advocate - Harinkhede R.T.

Shalu Umesh Ukey

Ranjit Arjun Meshram

Hearing History

Judge: 41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia

23-04-2026

Charge

11-03-2026

Order

19-01-2026

Charge

15-12-2025

Charge

23-09-2025

Charge

Interim Orders

06-01-2024
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY: Regular bail granted to all three accused (Chhaya Arjun Meshram, Shalu Umesh Uke, and Ranjit Arjun Meshram) in a case involving assault and caste-based insult under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Each accused must execute a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 15,000 with a solvent surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and non-contact with the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: Regular bail granted to all three accused (Chhaya Arjun Meshram, Shalu Umesh Uke, and Ranjit Arjun Meshram) in a case involving assault and caste-based insult under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Each accused must execute a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 15,000 with a solvent surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and non-contact with the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Gondia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case