Suresh Dadu Katre vs Kesharbai Rishishwar Bawankar- — 69/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHGO010013942023
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-10-2023
Filing Number
687/2023
Filing Date
23-10-2023
Registration No
69/2023
Registration Date
30-10-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
5-Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Dadu Katre
Adv. Ahuja Kirti
Respondent(s)
Kesharbai Rishishwar Bawankar-
Rajesh Rishishwar Bawankar
Mangesh Rishishwar Bawankar
Sandhya Dhruvottar Madankar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-11-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary RCA No. 69/2023 – Suresh v. Kesharbai+3 The application filed by the appellant was allowed. The court restrained defendants No.1 and 2 from creating any third-party interest in the suit property until further orders, recognizing the appellant's reasonable apprehension that defendants might dispose of or encumber the property during the pending appeal, which would render the appeal infructuous. The court noted that the lower court had answered key issues affirmatively regarding the sale agreement execution and plaintiff's readiness to perform contractual obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary RCA No. 69/2023 – Suresh v. Kesharbai+3 The application filed by the appellant was allowed. The court restrained defendants No.1 and 2 from creating any third-party interest in the suit property until further orders, recognizing the appellant's reasonable apprehension that defendants might dispose of or encumber the property during the pending appeal, which would render the appeal infructuous. The court noted that the lower court had answered key issues affirmatively regarding the sale agreement execution and plaintiff's readiness to perform contractual obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts