Satyabhama W/o. Rajendra Bhandarkar vs Parmeshwar S/o. Maroti Kendre-01 Advocate - Prakash M. Nichakawade — 120/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHGO010013692023

e-Filing Number

11-10-2023

Filing Number

670/2023

Filing Date

18-Oct-2023

Registration No

120/2023

Registration Date

25-Oct-2023

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Satyabhama W/o. Rajendra Bhandarkar

    Adv. Timande A. D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parmeshwar S/o. Maroti Kendre-01 Advocate - Prakash M. Nichakawade

  2. 2.Sercretary, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  7. 08-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: MACP No. 120/2023 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Gondia granted the respondents' application seeking amendment of their written statement. The court allowed correction of a typographical error in paragraph 26 where the deceased's name was incorrectly mentioned as "Vilas Tularam Madavi" instead of "Mahak Rajendra Bhandarkar." The respondents were directed to file the amended written statement within 14 days, with the court finding the amendment formal in nature causing no prejudice to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  10. 23-Jul-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  11. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  12. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  13. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  14. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  15. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  16. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  17. 18-Sep-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  18. 10-Jul-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  19. 19-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  20. 24-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  21. 13-Mar-2024

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  22. 07-Feb-2024

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  23. 15-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  24. 26-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 18-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACP No. 120/2023 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Gondia granted the respondents' application seeking amendment of their written statement. The court allowed correction of a typographical error in paragraph 26 where the deceased's name was incorrectly mentioned as "Vilas Tularam Madavi" instead of "Mahak Rajendra Bhandarkar." The respondents were directed to file the amended written statement within 14 days, with the court finding the amendment formal in nature causing no prejudice to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case