State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa vs Rajeshwar S/o Dullu Mohare -3(Atro. Male) Advocate - Jani V.L. — 140/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,504,506,34. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHGO010013152024

Hearing Before Charge

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

616/2024

Filing Date

28-08-2024

Registration No

140/2024

Registration Date

28-08-2024

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

FIR Details

FIR Number

200

Police Station

Salekasa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,504,506,34
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(f),3(1)(r)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa

Adv. Agashe P. S.

Respondent(s)

Rajeshwar S/o Dullu Mohare -3(Atro. Male) Advocate - Jani V.L.

Sau. Fulwanti W/o. Rajeshwar Mohare

Ganesh S/o Tukaram Gurbele

Manilal S/o. Shivlal Machirke

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

06-05-2026

Hearing Before Charge

11-03-2026

Hearing Before Charge

06-01-2026

Appearance

19-11-2025

Appearance

16-09-2025

Appearance

Interim Orders

14-10-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Bail application granted. Accused nos. 1-4 in Crime No. 200/2024 (Salekasa PS) are released on bail with PR bond of Rs. 25,000 each and one solvent surety of like amount. The court found the case involves a property dispute, applicants cooperated during investigation and were not arrested, thus bail was allowed subject to conditions including regular trial attendance, no witness intimidation, and no evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail application granted. Accused nos. 1-4 in Crime No. 200/2024 (Salekasa PS) are released on bail with PR bond of Rs. 25,000 each and one solvent surety of like amount. The court found the case involves a property dispute, applicants cooperated during investigation and were not arrested, thus bail was allowed subject to conditions including regular trial attendance, no witness intimidation, and no evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Gondia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case