Yamunabai Laxman Sarate 2 vs Sanjay Bahauram Manegudge Advocate - Ramteke S.S. — 64/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.

M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases

CNR: MHGO010008102025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-06-2025

Filing Number

403/2025

Filing Date

11-06-2025

Registration No

64/2025

Registration Date

17-06-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

40-District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge Gondia

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Yamunabai Laxman Sarate 2

Adv. Pateh Hemlata Shashikumar

Sugaratbai Doma Sarate

Adv. Priyanka Tilakram Bagde

Soma Laxman Sarate

Adv. Katre R.O.

Respondent(s)

Sanjay Bahauram Manegudge Advocate - Ramteke S.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 40-District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge Gondia

30-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Order

04-03-2026

Arguments

23-02-2026

Hearing

22-12-2025

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The District Court of Gondia allowed the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, finding that the applicants—illiterate Scheduled Tribe members, including an elderly woman and widow—had shown sufficient cause for the 452-day delay in filing their appeal. The court adopted a liberal approach, considering their financial constraints, lack of communication facilities, and absence of intentional or malafide conduct, while balancing equities by imposing costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to the non-applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court of Gondia allowed the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, finding that the applicants—illiterate Scheduled Tribe members, including an elderly woman and widow—had shown sufficient cause for the 452-day delay in filing their appeal. The court adopted a liberal approach, considering their financial constraints, lack of communication facilities, and absence of intentional or malafide conduct, while balancing equities by imposing costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to the non-applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Gondia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case