Yamunabai Laxman Sarate 2 vs Sanjay Bahauram Manegudge Advocate - Ramteke S.S. — 64/2025
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.
M.J.Cases - Misc. Judicial Cases
CNR: MHGO010008102025
e-Filing Number
13-06-2025
Filing Number
403/2025
Filing Date
11-06-2025
Registration No
64/2025
Registration Date
17-06-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
40-District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge Gondia
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yamunabai Laxman Sarate 2
Adv. Pateh Hemlata Shashikumar
Sugaratbai Doma Sarate
Adv. Priyanka Tilakram Bagde
Soma Laxman Sarate
Adv. Katre R.O.
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Bahauram Manegudge Advocate - Ramteke S.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 40-District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge Gondia
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Hearing
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Order |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 22-12-2025 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Court of Gondia allowed the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, finding that the applicants—illiterate Scheduled Tribe members, including an elderly woman and widow—had shown sufficient cause for the 452-day delay in filing their appeal. The court adopted a liberal approach, considering their financial constraints, lack of communication facilities, and absence of intentional or malafide conduct, while balancing equities by imposing costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to the non-applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The District Court of Gondia allowed the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, finding that the applicants—illiterate Scheduled Tribe members, including an elderly woman and widow—had shown sufficient cause for the 452-day delay in filing their appeal. The court adopted a liberal approach, considering their financial constraints, lack of communication facilities, and absence of intentional or malafide conduct, while balancing equities by imposing costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to the non-applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts