Haresh S/o Shrichand Adwani vs Deepak S/o Motilal Jaipuria Advocate - Popat N.S. — 22/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 372. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHGO010007602022
Filing Number
409/2022
Filing Date
30-05-2022
Registration No
22/2022
Registration Date
03-06-2022
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Haresh S/o Shrichand Adwani
Adv. Tolani P. T.
Respondent(s)
Deepak S/o Motilal Jaipuria Advocate - Popat N.S.
Arun S/o Shrikrishna Agrawal
Adv. Agashe R. N.
Balkrushna S/o Chandramohan Maheshwari
Adv. Mayank M Gupta
Rinku @ Rahul S/o Pradeepkumar Singhaniya
Adv. Bhadupotey H.B.
Dineshkumar S/o Motilal Jaipuriya
Adv. Popat N.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Citation
Citation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 02-04-2026 | Citation |
| 30-03-2026 | Citation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Gondia partly allowed the victim's appeal against the trial court's acquittal of five accused persons. The court found serious irregularities in the framing of charges—particularly regarding Section 294 IPC (obscene language) and omission to frame charges for criminal/house trespass—which vitiated the trial. The court set aside the acquittal and remanded the case for retrial with properly rectified charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Gondia partly allowed the victim's appeal against the trial court's acquittal of five accused persons. The court found serious irregularities in the framing of charges—particularly regarding Section 294 IPC (obscene language) and omission to frame charges for criminal/house trespass—which vitiated the trial. The court set aside the acquittal and remanded the case for retrial with properly rectified charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts