Bali @ Balkrishna S/o Chandramohan Maheshwari vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Gondia City Advocate - Chandwani M. S. — 19/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHGO010007422022
Filing Number
391/2022
Filing Date
24-05-2022
Registration No
19/2022
Registration Date
24-05-2022
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bali @ Balkrishna S/o Chandramohan Maheshwari
Adv. Gupta Shri M. K.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Gondia City Advocate - Chandwani M. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Citation
Citation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 02-04-2026 | Citation |
| 30-03-2026 | Citation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court set aside the conviction of Bali Maheshwari and ordered a retrial, finding that the original trial was vitiated by serious defects in the charge framing. Key errors included: incorrect location of the incident, failure to properly frame charges for the April 15, 2017 incident, and convicting the accused for crimes without properly charging them, particularly regarding unlawful assembly which requires minimum five persons but only two were involved on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court set aside the conviction of Bali Maheshwari and ordered a retrial, finding that the original trial was vitiated by serious defects in the charge framing. Key errors included: incorrect location of the incident, failure to properly frame charges for the April 15, 2017 incident, and convicting the accused for crimes without properly charging them, particularly regarding unlawful assembly which requires minimum five persons but only two were involved on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts