State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar vs Chandrashekhar Ashok Patle (POCSO) Advocate - Bhajipale R.N. — 77/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(2). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHGO010007212025
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
345/2025
Filing Date
15-05-2025
Registration No
77/2025
Registration Date
15-05-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
FIR Details
FIR Number
131
Police Station
Dugeepar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar
Adv. Chandwani M. S.
Respondent(s)
Chandrashekhar Ashok Patle (POCSO) Advocate - Bhajipale R.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Bail Application Rejected The District Judge rejected the bail application of Chandrashekhar in Special (POCSO) Case No. 77/2025. The accused was arrested for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a 6-year-old minor girl under sections 65(2) BNS, sections 4 and 6 POCSO Act, and SC & ST (POA) Act. The court found the offence extremely serious and determined that releasing the accused on bail posed a danger to other children and risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Bail Application Rejected The District Judge rejected the bail application of Chandrashekhar in Special (POCSO) Case No. 77/2025. The accused was arrested for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a 6-year-old minor girl under sections 65(2) BNS, sections 4 and 6 POCSO Act, and SC & ST (POA) Act. The court found the offence extremely serious and determined that releasing the accused on bail posed a danger to other children and risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts