State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar vs Chandrashekhar Ashok Patle (POCSO) Advocate - Bhajipale R.N. — 77/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(2). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHGO010007212025
Filing Number
345/2025
Filing Date
15-May-2025
Registration No
77/2025
Registration Date
15-May-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
131
Police Station
Dugeepar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Dugeepar
Adv. Chandwani M. S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandrashekhar Ashok Patle (POCSO) Advocate - Bhajipale R.N.
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
06-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
17-Sep-2025
List of Witness
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
03-Sep-2025
Charge
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
21-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Bail Application Rejected The District Judge rejected the bail application of Chandrashekhar in Special (POCSO) Case No. 77/2025. The accused was arrested for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a 6-year-old minor girl under sections 65(2) BNS, sections 4 and 6 POCSO Act, and SC & ST (POA) Act. The court found the offence extremely serious and determined that releasing the accused on bail posed a danger to other children and risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Aug-2025
Charge
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
14-Aug-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
01-Aug-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
18-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
10-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
04-Jul-2025
Charge
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
20-Jun-2025
Charge
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
06-Jun-2025
Charge
District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
-
26-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2025
Bail Application Rejected The District Judge rejected the bail application of Chandrashekhar in Special (POCSO) Case No. 77/2025. The accused was arrested for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a 6-year-old minor girl under sections 65(2) BNS, sections 4 and 6 POCSO Act, and SC & ST (POA) Act. The court found the offence extremely serious and determined that releasing the accused on bail posed a danger to other children and risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts