State of Maharashtra Through PSO Keshori vs Manoj Mankasay Naitam (POCSO) Advocate - LADC Deputy Tiwari S.R. — 69/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,64(2)(m). Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHGO010006642025
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
Filing Number
309/2025
Filing Date
02-05-2025
Registration No
69/2025
Registration Date
02-05-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
Keshori
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Keshori
Adv. APP SHROTE
Respondent(s)
Manoj Mankasay Naitam (POCSO) Advocate - LADC Deputy Tiwari S.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
List of Witness
List of Witness
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | List of Witness |
| 23-12-2025 | List of Witness |
| 29-09-2025 | Charge |
| 02-07-2025 | Charge |
| 23-06-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary Bail granted to accused Manoj Manakram Naitam in Crime No. 25/2025 involving charges under BNS sections 64, 64(2)(n) and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8. The court found mitigating circumstances as the case involved consensual relations between acquaintances, with the prosecutrix (a minor) willing to reside with the applicant. Bail conditions imposed include Rs. 30,000 PR bond with surety, no evidence tampering, no witness intimidation, regular court attendance, and no pressure on the prosecutrix. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Bail granted to accused Manoj Manakram Naitam in Crime No. 25/2025 involving charges under BNS sections 64, 64(2)(n) and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8. The court found mitigating circumstances as the case involved consensual relations between acquaintances, with the prosecutrix (a minor) willing to reside with the applicant. Bail conditions imposed include Rs. 30,000 PR bond with surety, no evidence tampering, no witness intimidation, regular court attendance, and no pressure on the prosecutrix. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts