Hastkala Wd/o Murlidhar Patle vs Mukesh S/o Hemraj Burle Advocate - Das S.H. — 31/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHGO010005522024
e-Filing Number
10-04-2024
Filing Number
290/2024
Filing Date
16-Apr-2024
Registration No
31/2024
Registration Date
20-Apr-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
5-Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hastkala Wd/o Murlidhar Patle
Adv. RAJKUMARI KATRE
-
2.Akash S/o Murlidhar Patle
Adv. RAJKUMARI KATRE
-
3.Rakesh Murlidhar Patle
Adv. RAJKUMARI KATRE
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mukesh S/o Hemraj Burle Advocate - Das S.H.
-
2.Raju s/o Narayan Rahangdale
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
27-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The M.A.C.T. (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) at Gondia allowed Respondent No.3's written statement to be filed on record, despite being added after issues were framed. The court rejected the request for an additional issue, holding that existing Issue No.3 already covers Respondent No.3's plea of non-involvement, placing the burden on the claimant to prove his responsibility. The case is adjourned for the claimant's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Jan-2026
Filing of Affidavit
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
13-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
23-Dec-2025
W.S. and Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
08-Dec-2025
W.S. and Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
17-Nov-2025
W.S. and Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
11-Nov-2025
W.S. and Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
28-Oct-2025
W.S. and Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
20-Sep-2025
W.S. and Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
19-Aug-2025
Awaiting Notice
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
04-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Aug-2025
Compliance
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
23-Jul-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
08-Jul-2025
Filing of Affidavit
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
24-Jun-2025
Filing of Affidavit
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
11-Jun-2025
Filing of Affidavit
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
05-Apr-2025
Issues
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
18-Mar-2025
Issues
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
10-Feb-2025
Issues
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
28-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
02-Jan-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
20-Dec-2024
No W.S. Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
26-Nov-2024
No W.S. Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
23-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
21-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
13-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
18-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
-
22-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2024
Summary: The M.A.C.T. (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) at Gondia allowed Respondent No.3's written statement to be filed on record, despite being added after issues were framed. The court rejected the request for an additional issue, holding that existing Issue No.3 already covers Respondent No.3's plea of non-involvement, placing the burden on the claimant to prove his responsibility. The case is adjourned for the claimant's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts