State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa (O.S) vs Ishwarprasad s/o Nandlal Zarne Advocate - Adv. Rekha B. Khobragade — 37/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,504,506. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHGO010004822022

Evidence

Next Hearing

22nd May 2026

Filing Number

206/2022

Filing Date

23-03-2022

Registration No

37/2022

Registration Date

24-03-2022

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

40-District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge Gondia

FIR Details

FIR Number

177

Police Station

Salekasa

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 353,504,506

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Salekasa (O.S)

Adv. Khandelwal K.R.

Respondent(s)

Ishwarprasad s/o Nandlal Zarne Advocate - Adv. Rekha B. Khobragade

Hearing History

Judge: 40-District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge Gondia

10-04-2026

Evidence

04-04-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

20-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

06-01-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The District Court of Gondia rejected the accused's discharge application under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. on January 6, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence of offences under IPC Sections 353, 504, and 506 (assault on public servant, criminal intimidation, and criminal threats) based on specific allegations that the accused took government seals, threw them away, and threatened a public servant. The court held that while false implication and counter-allegations are available as defences, mere enmity does not warrant discharge when material evidence exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Gondia rejected the accused's discharge application under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. on January 6, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence of offences under IPC Sections 353, 504, and 506 (assault on public servant, criminal intimidation, and criminal threats) based on specific allegations that the accused took government seals, threw them away, and threatened a public servant. The court held that while false implication and counter-allegations are available as defences, mere enmity does not warrant discharge when material evidence exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Gondia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case