Rajendra Madan Maraskolhe vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Rawanwadi Advocate - Chandwani M. S. — 93/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHGO010004742026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
199/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
93/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Madan Maraskolhe
Adv. SHABANA SHAUKAT ANSARI
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Rawanwadi Advocate - Chandwani M. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 09-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The District Judge at Gondia granted bail to Rajendra, accused of assaulting an intellectually disabled victim under BNS Sections 75(2), 115, and POCSO Act Section 8. The court found that since most offences carry maximum 5-year sentences and the trial process would take considerable time, continued detention served no purpose. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs.20,000 PR bond, restrictions on visiting the victim's village, non-interference with witnesses, and regular trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Judge at Gondia granted bail to Rajendra, accused of assaulting an intellectually disabled victim under BNS Sections 75(2), 115, and POCSO Act Section 8. The court found that since most offences carry maximum 5-year sentences and the trial process would take considerable time, continued detention served no purpose. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs.20,000 PR bond, restrictions on visiting the victim's village, non-interference with witnesses, and regular trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts