Mahendra Tulram Dhande - 1 vs State of Maharashtra through PSO Gondia City Advocate - Chandwani M. S. — 91/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHGO010004702026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
198/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
91/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Gondiya City
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahendra Tulram Dhande - 1
Adv. MOBIN SHEIKH
-
2.Vishal S/o Madhav Kkhandelwal
Adv. MOBIN SHEIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Gondia City Advocate - Chandwani M. S.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The District Judge granted conditional anticipatory bail to applicants Mahendra Dhande and another under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, directing that if an FIR is registered by Gondia City Police Station, the applicants must be given 72 hours advance notice before arrest. The court disposed of the application based on precedent since no FIR had been filed at the time of hearing, only police inquiry was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
-
11-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2026
The District Judge granted conditional anticipatory bail to applicants Mahendra Dhande and another under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, directing that if an FIR is registered by Gondia City Police Station, the applicants must be given 72 hours advance notice before arrest. The court disposed of the application based on precedent since no FIR had been filed at the time of hearing, only police inquiry was ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts