Aditya Ajay Singh Gaur vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora Advocate - Chandwani M. S. — 89/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHGO010004512026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
191/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
89/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
Tirora
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aditya Ajay Singh Gaur
Adv. Kajal P. Meshram
Rahul Anil Singh Gaherwar
Adv. Kajal P. Meshram
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora Advocate - Chandwani M. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Judge of Gondia rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Aditya Gaur and another, finding that the FIR prima facie establishes a case under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court held that since 'Mehatar' is a recognized Scheduled Caste and the applicants used caste-based abusive language against the informant in public, the statutory bar under Section 18 of the Atrocities Act applies, making the anticipatory bail application untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Judge of Gondia rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Aditya Gaur and another, finding that the FIR prima facie establishes a case under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court held that since 'Mehatar' is a recognized Scheduled Caste and the applicants used caste-based abusive language against the informant in public, the statutory bar under Section 18 of the Atrocities Act applies, making the anticipatory bail application untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts