Aditya Ajay Singh Gaur vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora Advocate - Chandwani M. S. — 89/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHGO010004512026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

191/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

1-District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

246

Police Station

Tirora

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aditya Ajay Singh Gaur

    Adv. Kajal P. Meshram

  2. 2.Rahul Anil Singh Gaherwar

    Adv. Kajal P. Meshram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tirora Advocate - Chandwani M. S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The District Judge of Gondia rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Aditya Gaur and another, finding that the FIR prima facie establishes a case under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court held that since 'Mehatar' is a recognized Scheduled Caste and the applicants used caste-based abusive language against the informant in public, the statutory bar under Section 18 of the Atrocities Act applies, making the anticipatory bail application untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-I Addl.Sessions Judge Gondia.

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge of Gondia rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Aditya Gaur and another, finding that the FIR prima facie establishes a case under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court held that since 'Mehatar' is a recognized Scheduled Caste and the applicants used caste-based abusive language against the informant in public, the statutory bar under Section 18 of the Atrocities Act applies, making the anticipatory bail application untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case