Kapil Ramprasad Neware vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Gangazari Advocate - Chandwani M. S. — 77/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHGO010004052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

174/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

77/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Gondia

Judge

41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

Gangazari

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Kapil Ramprasad Neware

Adv. Sheikh P.Z.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Gangazari Advocate - Chandwani M. S.

Hearing History

Judge: 41-District Judge-2 Addl. Sessions Judge Gondia

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

13-03-2026

Hearing

11-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia granted anticipatory bail to applicant Kapil s/o Ramprasad Neware in a rash and negligent driving case. The judge found significant investigative lapses—including inconsistencies in vehicle recovery documentation, missing CCTV evidence of the actual incident, lack of spot sketch, and no justified reason for custodial interrogation—undermining the prosecution's case. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia granted anticipatory bail to applicant Kapil s/o Ramprasad Neware in a rash and negligent driving case. The judge found significant investigative lapses—including inconsistencies in vehicle recovery documentation, missing CCTV evidence of the actual incident, lack of spot sketch, and no justified reason for custodial interrogation—undermining the prosecution's case. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Gondia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case