State of Maharashtra through PSO Dauniwada vs Dhumreshwar Baba S/o Pramod Deshbhratar-2 (Atro.-SC-Male) Advocate - Jani V.L. — 37/2020
Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r)(s),3(2)(5-a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHGO010003572020
Filing Number
204/2020
Filing Date
05-05-2020
Registration No
37/2020
Registration Date
05-05-2020
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
5-Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
Dauniwada
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Dauniwada
Adv. Pardhi Krushna D.
Respondent(s)
Dhumreshwar Baba S/o Pramod Deshbhratar-2 (Atro.-SC-Male) Advocate - Jani V.L.
Kundan S/o Vijay Tighare
Adv. Barapatre V.N.
Kunal @ Sonu S/o Umesh Rane
Adv. Barapatre V.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Principal District and Sessions Judge Gondia
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Judge acquitted all three accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294, 323, and 506 (read with Section 34) and the SC/ST Atrocities Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations. The court ruled that witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked substantive evidence—both witnesses testified they fell due to a motorcycle collision on a road under construction, not from deliberate restraint or assault by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Special Judge acquitted all three accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294, 323, and 506 (read with Section 34) and the SC/ST Atrocities Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations. The court ruled that witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked substantive evidence—both witnesses testified they fell due to a motorcycle collision on a road under construction, not from deliberate restraint or assault by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts