State of Maharashtra Through PSO Gangazari vs Rohit Gopal Pusam (POCSO) Advocate - Upwanshi A.H. — 43/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(n),363. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHGO010003302024
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
Filing Number
166/2024
Filing Date
04-03-2024
Registration No
43/2024
Registration Date
04-03-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Gondia
Judge
35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
Gangazari
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Gangazari
Adv. Pardhi Krushna D.
Respondent(s)
Rohit Gopal Pusam (POCSO) Advocate - Upwanshi A.H.
Hearing History
Judge: 35-District Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondia
List of Witness
Charge
Charge
Charge
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | List of Witness |
| 11-03-2026 | Charge |
| 10-02-2026 | Charge |
| 03-02-2026 | Charge |
| 27-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The Sessions Court at Gondia allowed the second bail application of Rohit, accused in a POCSO case, on 19.05.2025. The 18-year-old accused was ordered released on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety, subject to stringent conditions including monthly police reporting, non-association with the victim, and restrictions on leaving Maharashtra. The court emphasized the accused's young age, lack of criminal antecedents, prolonged pre-trial detention exceeding one year, and the victim's filed no-objection to bail in granting the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED The Sessions Court at Gondia allowed the second bail application of Rohit, accused in a POCSO case, on 19.05.2025. The 18-year-old accused was ordered released on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety, subject to stringent conditions including monthly police reporting, non-association with the victim, and restrictions on leaving Maharashtra. The court emphasized the accused's young age, lack of criminal antecedents, prolonged pre-trial detention exceeding one year, and the victim's filed no-objection to bail in granting the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts